CoAP/coapthon
Matthieu BRIEDA 264167e3d1
Update Blocklayer to deal with Block1 option
On the last block answer, the Client still sent another empty message, it didn't take into account the fact that the previous block was sent with m=0. This commit fixed that for me.
2018-03-14 17:24:57 +01:00
..
caching Porting to Python3 2018-01-23 11:31:46 +01:00
client set receiver thread as daemon 2018-03-02 15:42:22 +01:00
forward_proxy removed forced logging 2018-02-21 13:23:47 +01:00
http_proxy Porting to Python3 2018-01-23 11:31:46 +01:00
layers Update Blocklayer to deal with Block1 option 2018-03-14 17:24:57 +01:00
messages Basic client-side implementation of RFC7967: CoAP No-Response Option 2018-02-19 14:06:35 +01:00
resources Porting to Python3 2018-01-23 11:31:46 +01:00
reverse_proxy removed forced logging 2018-02-21 13:23:47 +01:00
server removed forced logging 2018-02-21 13:23:47 +01:00
__init__.py Porting to Python3 2018-01-23 11:31:46 +01:00
defines.py Basic client-side implementation of RFC7967: CoAP No-Response Option 2018-02-19 14:06:35 +01:00
serializer.py Let the outbound payload be binary 2018-03-05 16:41:11 +01:00
serializer.py.bak Porting to Python3 2018-01-23 11:31:46 +01:00
transaction.py Porting to Python3 2018-01-23 11:31:46 +01:00
utils.py Porting to Python3 2018-01-23 11:31:46 +01:00
utils.py.bak Porting to Python3 2018-01-23 11:31:46 +01:00