IEEE Std 802.11-2012 description of SAE does not require this, i.e., it
describes the requirement as 0 < scalar < r for processing the Commit
message. However, this is not correct and will be changes to 1 < scalar
< r to match the Dragonfly description so that a trivial secret case
will be avoided explicitly.
This is not much of an issue for the locally generated commit-scalar
since it would be very unlikely to get the value of 1. For Commit
message processing, a peer with knowledge of the password could
potentially force the exchange to expose key material without this
check.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This provides more information to upper layer programs on what happens
with connection attempts in cases where the enabled networks are not
found in scan results.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>
wpa_supplicant has stub functions if the external p2p symbols are
unavailable, but the build still fails if the
wpa_driver_nl80211_driver_cmd symbol is missing. Fix this by leaving the
function pointer NULL. This is safe because wpa_drv_driver_cmd() performs
a NULL check.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@google.com>
If BOARD_HOSTAPD_PRIVATE_LIB is not used on an Android build, we will
need to replace both the p2p functions *and* wpa_driver_nl80211_driver_cmd
in order to successfully link. Let's make the name more generic so it is
more obvious what it is used for.
Suggested-by: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@google.com>
In case memory allocation fails, data->pac_opaque_encr_key may be NULL
and lead to possible crash.
Signed-off-by: Maneesh Jain <maneesh.jain@samsung.com>
Even though this OpenSSL function is documented as returning "1 if point
if on the curve and 0 otherwise", it can apparently return -1 on some
error cases. Be prepared for that and check explicitly against 1 instead
of non-zero.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
If PWE is discovered before the minimum number of loops (k) is reached,
the extra iterations use a random "password" to further obfuscate the
cost of discovering PWE.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This replaces the earlier IEEE Std 802.11-2012 algorithm with the design
from P802.11-REVmc/D4.0. Things brings in a blinding technique for
determining whether the pwd-seed results in a suitable PWE value.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This allows the IKE groups 27-30 (RFC 6932) to be used with OpenSSL
1.0.2 and newer. For now, these get enabled for SAE as configurable
groups (sae_groups parameter), but the new groups are not enabled by
default.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
draft-irtf-cfrg-dragonfly recommends implementation to set the security
parameter, k, to a value of at least 40. This will make PWE generation
take significantly more resources, but makes it more likely to hide
timing differences due to different number of loops needed to find a
suitable PWE.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This changes the sae_groups test case design to try with every group and
skip triggering test failure for the heavier ones that are likely to
fail in some VM setups under load. This provides more testing coverage
by not limiting the test based on lowest common setup.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This check explicitly for reflection attack and stops authentication
immediately if that is detected instead of continuing to the following
4-way handshake that would fail due to the attacker not knowing the key
from the SAE exchange.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
The variables here are unsigned and as such, cannot have a negative
value. Use == 0 instead of <= 0 to make this cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
OpenSSL 0.9.8 (and newer) includes SSL_CTX_get_app_data() and
SSL_CTX_set_app_data(), so there is no need to maintain this old
OPENSSL_SUPPORTS_CTX_APP_DATA backwards compatibility design.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Previously, it would have been possible for va_end(args) to be called
twice in case mp_init() fails. While that may not cause issues on number
of platforms, that is not how va_start()/va_end() are supposed to be
used. Fix this by returning from the function without using va_end()
twice on the same va_list args.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This gets rid of a static analyzer warning. The actual value for
WpaGuiApp::w will be set after the constructor has returned, so this
value was not really used uninitialized.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
These configuration parameters did not use matching printf format string
parameters (signed vs. unsigned). While these configuratin values are,
in practice, small unsigned integers, the implementation should use
matching types to write these.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
fqdn was not freed before return in case the server uses an unsupported
location for the PPS MO in the addMO command.
Signed-off-by: Nishant Chaprana <n.chaprana@samsung.com>
The construction used here to figure out the offset of variable length
IEs in Probe Request frames was a bit odd looking and resulted in a
warning from a static analyzer, so replace it with more standard use of
offsetof().
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
The flags argument is used to indicate a failure case (0x80) which
allows erp == NULL. This may be a bit too difficult combination for
static analyzers to understand, so add an explicit check for !erp as
another condition for returning from the function before the erp pointer
gets dereferenced without checking it.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
drv cannot be NULL here (it is dereferenced even on the preceding line)
and anyway, os_free(NULL) is allowed, so remove the redundant check.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
The eap argument to this function is never NULL and the earlier
ieee802_1x_learn_identity() call is dereferencing it anyway, so there is
no point in checking whether it is NULL later in the function.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This verifies a case where the neighboring BSS is at the other end of
the band and has its PRI channel further away.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This needs to find the PRI channel also in cases where the affected
channel is the SEC channel of a 40 MHz BSS, so need to include the
scanning coverage here to be 40 MHz from the center frequency. Without
this, it was possible to miss a neighboring 40 MHz BSS that was at the
other end of the 2.4 GHz band and had its PRI channel further away from
the local BSS.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
There is no need to have separate return statements for these corner
cases that are unlikely to be hit in practice.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
