One of the steps that expected failure due to PMKID mismatch did not
stop connection attempts. This could result in the following test step
failing due to the previous profile with peaplabel=1 getting used to
derive the MSK incorrectly.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
The wait_event() call for scan completion could have processed a
previously received event from a prior scan instead of the newly started
one. This could result in flush_scan_cache() assuming there are still
results in the cache even though the scan request to clear the cache had
not even be started yet.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Use more readable "foo not in bar" construction for the couple of places
that did "not foo in bar".
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Prior cleanup broke the indentation here and made the addition of test
cases unreachable.
Fixes: 0663ae22ff ("tests: Do not use tabs for indentation")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
The new DPP Configuration Result message can result in a bit different
behavior at the end of the configuration exchange and some of the test
cases need more flexibility to work with that DPP2 behavior.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
gas_address3 was set to 1 in this test case, but it was never cleared.
That can result in unexpected behavior in other test cases that dpeends
on gas_address3 being in its default value 0. Clear the parameter
explicitly to avoid this.
This resulted in an error in the following test sequence:
dpp_qr_code_auth_initiator_enrollee gas_anqp_address3_ap_forced
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
There was a race condition on starting the flush_scan_cache() operations
if a scan happened to be in progress when the test case ended since the
ABORT_SCAN success case did not wait for the pending scan operation to
be completed. Wait for the scan completion event in addition to the
disconnection event if the ABORT_SCAN command is accepted.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
There was a race condition on starting the flush_scan_cache() operations
if a scan happened to be in progress when the test case ended since the
ABORT_SCAN success case did not wait for the pending scan operation to
be completed. Wait for the scan completion event in addition to the
disconnection event if the ABORT_SCAN command is accepted.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
These TDLS test cases missed Popen() result decode() calls in the
earlier python3 compatibility changes. Add those to make debug log more
readable.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Wait explicitly for the DPP-NOT-COMPATIBLE event when going through
protocol testing with local failures instead of just waiting for a fixed
0.1 second duration. This prevents a test failure at least in
dppauth_resp_status_failure in a case where the failing operation may be
delayed under heavy CPU load.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Test case sequence "ap_wps_ap_scan_2 ap_wps_pbc_2ap" resulted in a
failure due to a scan entry being left behind from the first test case
and the second one ending up using that obsolete result during WPS_PBC
processing. Fix this by clearing the scan results explicitly on dev5.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Accept a smaller number of token responses in second round to avoid
failing this test case as frequently.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
The configurated fragmentation/RTS threshold value survives AP mode
interface restarts, so these values need to be explicitly cleared back
to default (disabled). This fixes an issue where some test cases could
not work correctly if fragmentation on the interface was enabled. For
example, this combination used to fail:
ap_fragmentation_open ap_hs20_fetch_osu
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
The first scan for the unknown BSSID could have been timed in a manner
that allows passive scanning to find the real AP even if that AP's
beacon interval was 1000 (e.g., heavy CPU load changed timing so that
the AP beaconing started at suitable time). The check for BSS result
entry not including Probe Response frame was comparing incorrect BSS
entries (bss2 vs. bss1) which resulted in the test case claiming failure
even when there was no unexpected Probe Response frame.
Fix this by comparing the beacon_ie and ie parameters from the same BSS
entry (bss1).
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Number of these test cases start connection attempt in wpa_supplicant
and then expected a specific failure to happen relatively quickly. This
could result in timeouts if the first scanning round missed to find the
AP (e.g., due to CPU load pushing out the Probe Response frame long
enough for the station having left the channel) and wpa_supplicant then
waiting five seconds before starting a new scan.
Make this more robust by scanning explicitly for the specific BSSID
before starting the connection attempt.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
This old interface has been obsoleted and should not have been used
since 2010, so remove testing for it in preparation to dropping the
interface completely from wpa_supplicant.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
No need to duplicate this functionality when all the ap_ft_pmf_*_over_ds
test cases are doing practically the same thing and the
no-specific-cipher-configuration case can be addressed easily with the
same helper function.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
The main step of the test case was accidentally removed when adding the
cipher specific versions.
Fixes: ffcaca68d3 ("tests: FT with different BIP algorithms")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Configure the sae_groups parameter for hostapd explicitly in preparation
for the default value change in the implementation.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Configure the sae_groups parameter for hostapd explicitly in preparation
for the default value change in the implementation.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Avoid an invalid failure case due to scan results being left behind from
connect_cmd_bssid_hint when executing connect_cmd_reject_assoc by
explicitly clearing the scan results from dev5. This fixes an error case
that happened with the following test case sequence:
connect_cmd_bssid_hint connect_cmd_reject_assoc
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
The wpas (dev5) control interface socket did not always get cleared in
the MACsec test cases and this could result in issues with following
test cases if the dev5 message queue hit the maximum limit.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Now that the backhaul STA Multi-AP association is not rejected anymore
by the AP, update the test case to expect disconnection to be triggered
by the STA.
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
With just one additional argument, the run_multi_ap_association()
function can be used for all tests.
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
This seems to be needed when using python3 in VM for the ssid_utf8 test
case debug prints from the control interface requests. This breaks
python2 support for the same logging entries, but there does not seem to
be any easy way of addressing this in a manner that works for both
python versions, so move ahead with the python3-only support from now
on.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
This test case was failing pretty frequently due to an issue in being
able to send out the Provision Discovery Response frame on the operating
channel. Now that wpa_supplicant has a fix for that issue, modify this
test case to hit this error condition every time. In addition, make sure
the possible exception from p2ps_exact_seek() does not get hidden with a
failing remove_group() call in the finally section.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Once mac80211 starts reporting the used Association Request frame IEs in
the association event, wpa_supplicant will update RSN supplicant IE
information based on that and that will make the AP reject EAPOL-Key msg
2/4 in this particular test scenario due to the hack of including two
RSN IEs in the Association Request frame. Accept this sequence as a
valid test execution in addition to the previously expected connection
to avoid reporting incorrect failures.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
