The EAP-TEAP server may skip Phase 2 if the client authentication could
be completed during Phase 1 based on client certificate. Handle this
similarly to the case of PAC use.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This is needed to allow clean transition from one inner EAP
authentication method to another one if EAP method negotiation is needed
within Phase 2.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This allows EAP-TLS to be used within an EAP-TEAP tunnel when there is
an explicit request for machine credentials. The network profile
parameters are otherwise same as the Phase 1 parameters, but each one
uses a "machine_" prefix for the parameter name.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
These parameters for certificate authentication are identical for the
Phase 1 (EAP-TLS alone) and Phase 2 (EAP-TLS inside a TLS tunnel).
Furthermore, yet another copy would be needed to support separate
machine credential in Phase 2. Clean this up by moving the shared
parameters into a separate data struct that can then be used for each
need without having to define separate struct members for each use.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Need to leave EAP-TEAP methodState == MAY_CONT when marking decision =
FAIL based on inner EAP method failure since this message will be
followed by protected failure indication.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This allows a separate machine credential to be used for authentication
if the server requests Identity-Type = 2 (machine).
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Parse the received Identity-Type TLV and report the used Identity-Type
in response if the request included this TLV. For now, only the
Identity-Type 1 (User) is supported.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
The implementation was previously hardcoded to use only the non-expanded
IETF EAP methods in Phase 2. Extend that to allow vendor EAP methods
with expanded header to be used.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
If the Crypto-Binding TLV for the last EAP method has been validated
successfully in a previous message exchange with Intermediate-Result TLV
and no new EAP method has been started, Result TLV can be accepted
without an additional Crypto-Binding TLV. This allows the server to go
through additional message exchanges after inner EAP method, if needed.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Previously, only the Result TLV was added when writing Crypto-Binding
TLV response. This is not sufficient, since RFC 7170 require
Intermediate-Result TLV response to be included from the peer if the
server included Intermediate-Result TLV.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Need to update methodState/decision when completing transmission of
fragmented last Phase 2 message.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
This adds support for a new EAP method: EAP-TEAP (Tunnel Extensible
Authentication Protocol). This should be considered experimental since
RFC 7170 has number of conflicting statements and missing details to
allow unambiguous interpretation. As such, there may be interoperability
issues with other implementations and this version should not be
deployed for production purposes until those unclear areas are resolved.
This does not yet support use of NewSessionTicket message to deliver a
new PAC (either in the server or peer implementation). In other words,
only the in-tunnel distribution of PAC-Opaque is supported for now. Use
of the NewSessionTicket mechanism would require TLS library support to
allow arbitrary data to be specified as the contents of the message.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
