Add a workaround to clanc static analyzer warning
dl_list_del() followed by dl_list_add() seemed to confuse clang static analyzer somehow, so explicitly check for the prev pointer to be non-NULL to avoid an incorrect warning. Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									3e9fa3be62
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						f4452cc2b1
					
				
					 1 changed files with 12 additions and 0 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -391,6 +391,18 @@ void pmksa_candidate_add(struct wpa_sm *sm, const u8 *bssid, | ||||||
| 	dl_list_for_each(pos, &sm->pmksa_candidates, | 	dl_list_for_each(pos, &sm->pmksa_candidates, | ||||||
| 			 struct rsn_pmksa_candidate, list) { | 			 struct rsn_pmksa_candidate, list) { | ||||||
| 		if (cand->priority <= pos->priority) { | 		if (cand->priority <= pos->priority) { | ||||||
|  | 			if (!pos->list.prev) { | ||||||
|  | 				/*
 | ||||||
|  | 				 * This cannot really happen in pracrice since | ||||||
|  | 				 * pos was fetched from the list and the prev | ||||||
|  | 				 * pointer must be set. It looks like clang | ||||||
|  | 				 * static analyzer gets confused with the | ||||||
|  | 				 * dl_list_del(&cand->list) call above and ends | ||||||
|  | 				 * up assuming pos->list.prev could be NULL. | ||||||
|  | 				 */ | ||||||
|  | 				os_free(cand); | ||||||
|  | 				return; | ||||||
|  | 			} | ||||||
| 			dl_list_add(pos->list.prev, &cand->list); | 			dl_list_add(pos->list.prev, &cand->list); | ||||||
| 			cand = NULL; | 			cand = NULL; | ||||||
| 			break; | 			break; | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Jouni Malinen
						Jouni Malinen