From e24b918202662c36bd6e72635cf343d30c03b63d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jouni Malinen Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:41:01 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] P2P: Coding style cleanup --- wpa_supplicant/dbus/dbus_new_handlers_p2p.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/wpa_supplicant/dbus/dbus_new_handlers_p2p.c b/wpa_supplicant/dbus/dbus_new_handlers_p2p.c index 1e3c83273..7ae117372 100644 --- a/wpa_supplicant/dbus/dbus_new_handlers_p2p.c +++ b/wpa_supplicant/dbus/dbus_new_handlers_p2p.c @@ -484,25 +484,24 @@ DBusMessage * wpas_dbus_handler_p2p_connect(DBusMessage *message, } else { switch (new_pin) { case -2: - err_msg = "connect failed due to" - " channel unavailability."; + err_msg = "connect failed due to channel " + "unavailability."; iface = WPAS_DBUS_ERROR_CONNECT_CHANNEL_UNAVAILABLE; break; case -3: - err_msg = "connect failed due to" - " unsupported channel."; + err_msg = "connect failed due to unsupported channel."; iface = WPAS_DBUS_ERROR_CONNECT_CHANNEL_UNSUPPORTED; break; default: - err_msg = "connect failed due to" - " unspecified error."; + err_msg = "connect failed due to unspecified error."; iface = WPAS_DBUS_ERROR_CONNECT_UNSPECIFIED_ERROR; break; } + /* - * TODO:: + * TODO: * Do we need specialized errors corresponding to above * error conditions as against just returning a different * error message?