Add explicit EAPOL-Key length validation in processKey()

These checks would not really be needed since eapol_sm_rx_eapol()
validates the length fields. Anyway, these makes it more obvious to
anyone reviewing the code that there are no integer underflow issues in
processKey().

Signed-hostap: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This commit is contained in:
Jouni Malinen 2012-08-07 21:59:15 +03:00
parent 70a26e708c
commit bf0d9ae40f

View file

@ -631,6 +631,7 @@ static void eapol_sm_processKey(struct eapol_sm *sm)
u8 ekey[IEEE8021X_KEY_IV_LEN + IEEE8021X_ENCR_KEY_LEN];
int key_len, res, sign_key_len, encr_key_len;
u16 rx_key_length;
size_t plen;
wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAPOL: processKey");
if (sm->last_rx_key == NULL)
@ -643,9 +644,12 @@ static void eapol_sm_processKey(struct eapol_sm *sm)
return;
}
if (sm->last_rx_key_len < sizeof(*hdr) + sizeof(*key))
return;
hdr = (struct ieee802_1x_hdr *) sm->last_rx_key;
key = (struct ieee802_1x_eapol_key *) (hdr + 1);
if (sizeof(*hdr) + be_to_host16(hdr->length) > sm->last_rx_key_len) {
plen = be_to_host16(hdr->length);
if (sizeof(*hdr) + plen > sm->last_rx_key_len || plen < sizeof(*key)) {
wpa_printf(MSG_WARNING, "EAPOL: Too short EAPOL-Key frame");
return;
}
@ -711,7 +715,7 @@ static void eapol_sm_processKey(struct eapol_sm *sm)
}
wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAPOL: EAPOL-Key key signature verified");
key_len = be_to_host16(hdr->length) - sizeof(*key);
key_len = plen - sizeof(*key);
if (key_len > 32 || rx_key_length > 32) {
wpa_printf(MSG_WARNING, "EAPOL: Too long key data length %d",
key_len ? key_len : rx_key_length);