Add explicit EAPOL-Key length validation in processKey()
These checks would not really be needed since eapol_sm_rx_eapol() validates the length fields. Anyway, these makes it more obvious to anyone reviewing the code that there are no integer underflow issues in processKey(). Signed-hostap: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This commit is contained in:
parent
70a26e708c
commit
bf0d9ae40f
1 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -631,6 +631,7 @@ static void eapol_sm_processKey(struct eapol_sm *sm)
|
|||
u8 ekey[IEEE8021X_KEY_IV_LEN + IEEE8021X_ENCR_KEY_LEN];
|
||||
int key_len, res, sign_key_len, encr_key_len;
|
||||
u16 rx_key_length;
|
||||
size_t plen;
|
||||
|
||||
wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAPOL: processKey");
|
||||
if (sm->last_rx_key == NULL)
|
||||
|
@ -643,9 +644,12 @@ static void eapol_sm_processKey(struct eapol_sm *sm)
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (sm->last_rx_key_len < sizeof(*hdr) + sizeof(*key))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
hdr = (struct ieee802_1x_hdr *) sm->last_rx_key;
|
||||
key = (struct ieee802_1x_eapol_key *) (hdr + 1);
|
||||
if (sizeof(*hdr) + be_to_host16(hdr->length) > sm->last_rx_key_len) {
|
||||
plen = be_to_host16(hdr->length);
|
||||
if (sizeof(*hdr) + plen > sm->last_rx_key_len || plen < sizeof(*key)) {
|
||||
wpa_printf(MSG_WARNING, "EAPOL: Too short EAPOL-Key frame");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -711,7 +715,7 @@ static void eapol_sm_processKey(struct eapol_sm *sm)
|
|||
}
|
||||
wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAPOL: EAPOL-Key key signature verified");
|
||||
|
||||
key_len = be_to_host16(hdr->length) - sizeof(*key);
|
||||
key_len = plen - sizeof(*key);
|
||||
if (key_len > 32 || rx_key_length > 32) {
|
||||
wpa_printf(MSG_WARNING, "EAPOL: Too long key data length %d",
|
||||
key_len ? key_len : rx_key_length);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue