/* Test of gang-private array variable declared on loop directive, with broadcasting to partitioned workers. */ /* { dg-additional-options "--param=openacc-kernels=decompose" } */ /* { dg-additional-options "-fopt-info-omp-all" } { dg-additional-options "-foffload=-fopt-info-omp-all" } */ /* { dg-additional-options "--param=openacc-privatization=noisy" } { dg-additional-options "-foffload=--param=openacc-privatization=noisy" } Prune a few: uninteresting: { dg-prune-output {note: variable 'D\.[0-9]+' declared in block isn't candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level: not addressable} } */ /* It's only with Tcl 8.5 (released in 2007) that "the variable 'varName' passed to 'incr' may be unset, and in that case, it will be set to [...]", so to maintain compatibility with earlier Tcl releases, we manually initialize counter variables: { dg-line l_dummy[variable c_compute 0 c_loop_i 0 c_loop_j 0 c_loop_k 0] } { dg-message "dummy" "" { target iN-VAl-Id } l_dummy } to avoid "WARNING: dg-line var l_dummy defined, but not used". */ #include int main (int argc, char* argv[]) { int x[8], i, arr[32 * 32]; for (i = 0; i < 32 * 32; i++) arr[i] = i; #pragma acc kernels copy(arr) { /* { dg-note {forwarded loop nest in OpenACC 'kernels' region to 'parloops' for analysis} {} { target *-*-* } .+1 } */ #pragma acc loop gang(num:32) private(x) /* { dg-line l_loop_i[incr c_loop_i] } */ /* { dg-note {variable 'x' in 'private' clause is candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop_i$c_loop_i } */ /* { dg-note {variable 'i' in 'private' clause isn't candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level: not addressable} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop_i$c_loop_i } */ /* { dg-note {variable 'j' declared in block isn't candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level: not addressable} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop_i$c_loop_i } */ for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) { for (int j = 0; j < 8; j++) x[j] = j * 2; #pragma acc loop worker(num:32) /* { dg-line l_loop_j[incr c_loop_j] } */ /* { dg-note {variable 'j' in 'private' clause isn't candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level: not addressable} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop_j$c_loop_j } */ for (int j = 0; j < 32; j++) arr[i * 32 + j] += x[j % 8]; } /* { dg-optimized {assigned OpenACC seq loop parallelism} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop_i$c_loop_i } */ } for (i = 0; i < 32 * 32; i++) assert (arr[i] == i + (i % 8) * 2); return 0; }